WELCOME TO THE SWORD OF TRUTH

The blog is design to addressing pressing global issues, thus serving as a medium for the voices of the voiceless in the humane quest of making our world a better and safer place for all of humanity. In a world confronted with daunting socio-economic and socio-political challenges, the blog will also provide compelling prescriptive policy measures for national, international and individual actors across the global political landscape.

The Elusive Scramble for Modern Africa: What must Continent Learn from History?

2010 February 4
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

Africa my Africa; Africa The Land of proud warriors of the ancestral savannah; Your blood flows through my veins; Your black blood that irrigates the river fields; The river fields of your work; The work of your slavery; The slavery of your children; Africa tell me Africa.”

These were the words of Senegalese Poet, Author, Philosopher, Philanthropist, Academic and Professor, the late Birago Diop. In this Poem, the late Birago Diop reminded Africa about her compelling sad historical evolution as an antidote that must used in redefining the socio-economical and socio-political dynamics of the continent in the changing world of our times.

With a new scramble for Africa that could be duped a historical repetition, when shall Africa arise from the natural slumber, and when shall Africa tell herself? These are the good questions that will continue to be rooted in to the annals of our history.

Historically the scramble for Africa dates back to the 19th century, when colonialism was the driving force that propelled world politics. Due to the proliferation of industrialization across the European peninsular, Africa became the center piece of a new scramble, resulting to the Partitioning of the whole continent, through western colonial machinations. In his book titled Topics in West African History, Ghanaian Professor Dr, Adu Boahen attributed political, economical and social reasons as the driving jargons behind the 19th century Scramble for Africa.

A careful analysis of the new scramble for Africa would show similar Political, economical and social trends as propelling mechanisms behind the new scramble.

Politically, Dr, Boahen attributed the 19th century scramble for Africa to colonies as a symbol of greatness for nation states. During that era, the more colonies a nation has, the more powerful and influential that nation was. In this modern scramble for Africa, it is not about colonies, but the influence that major global political actors could have on the political structures of African countries.

For example whilst the United States (US) and the European Union member countries champion Democracy as an influence of political structures for sustainable democracies across Africa, Countries such as China, Russia, Iran and Cuba have a considerable influence over the political structures of dictatorial and hybrid regimes across the continent. On another token, the political structures of African countries with Arabic influence are also greatly influenced by powerful Arabic nations. Theorizing modern African politics using a historical context is therefore no philosophical accident, but a life changing reality that stems from the historical pathway of societal evolution, thus bringing to light the elusive Scramble for Modern Africa.

Economically several other contemporary scholars of modern African studies including theorized the 19th century Scramble for Africa as a result of economic reasons. Dr. Boahen, for example argued that it was because of the need for new markets, for surplus manufactured goods caused by the spread of the industrial revolution from France to Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, during the second half of the 19th century. A quick analysis of Africa’s economic architecture would show similar paradigms as mechanisms that has propelled the Modern Elusive Scramble for Africa. The continent’s rich mineral potentials, and the over 60% majority youth population, attracted a spiraling dynamism for markets in the exploitation of minerals and communications technologies- notably in mobile phones and internet technology. Today, the United States (US), India, China, Russia, France, Britain and Brazil are all playing contentious roles in the forefront of the scramble for markets in various economic parallels – raw materials, mineral resources, diamonds, uranium, gold, silver, oil; a political axiom depicting the Modern Elusive Scramble for Africa. Social scientists are therefore right that history indeed repeats itself. Africa’s transformational realties are living testaments to such a great theory.

Socially, Africa has also become a cultural battlefront for actors across the continents socio-economic and socio-cultural structures. In view of African cultures is embodiment across social horizons of the continent, Western Culture –Americanization – have not onlytaken prominence over all others, but either aligned or if not overshadowing traditional African culture. It is also worth understanding that a proliferation of Chinese, Brazilian, Indian, Russian and Turkish culture has become a nouvelle paradigm of the Elusive Scramble for Modern Africa; a transformational antidote that concrete lessons could be drawn from.  Making reflections  on the 19th century scramble it is worth understanding that social machinations of colonial powers included using culture as a tool  of containing resistance to forces of colonialism. Dr. Boahen and other African scholars argued that the British imposed a system of Indirect Rule  to achieve such an objective, whilst the French on the other hand used a system of Assimilation. African political leaders must therefore be cognizant of such historical realities, and only by comparing it to modern realities, could constructive policy be driven for a better futture. 

As the ticking time of global evolutions continues to take shape, it is erstwhile worth depicting history as a policy mechanism in strengthening Africa’s quest for a united front. It is important to note that though the continents challenges continues to be undermined by the Westphalia imposed State System, the modern scramble fosters an opportunity for Africa, provided integration across political, economical and social parables takes a forefront of the African Union.

If Germans tore down the Berlin Wall that ushered the integration of East and West Germany into modern prosperous Germany, why can’t Africa tear down her imposed walls (boundaries). Africa’s potentials are great and enormous, however progress and aggressive prosperity depends on the pace of integration; politically, economically and socially.

Taking a backdrop to the question what must the continent learn from history, it is important to understand that, what Africa needs to effectively realize her potentials, is a Federal Government for an effective political integration, a single currency and passport for an efficient socio-economic integration, and a single national army, police and other security institutions for vibrant security architectures. There is no doubt that skeptics would continue downplaying such integration efforts, however to say it is impossible tantamount to a historical insult. And history will judge all the past, current and future leaders for dearly failing Africa’s integration efforts, and or arising from this natural slumber. Time will certainly tell.

State of the Union Address: Presented Just like it Is

2010 February 3
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

If anyone should argue that the Jan 2010 State of the Union Address was presented ‘just like it is,’ such an argument would fall right along the socio-political and socio-economic realities of the world’s most enduring democracies; The United States of America (USA).

Spurring on the state of the economy – bank bailouts and job creation- education and healthcare reforms, security and foreign policy during the colorful historic occasion, President Obama presented what many analysts characterized as a further emboldening and enlightenment of his agenda of change that propelled the democratic leadership to the power house of the United States; The White House.

Amidst conflicting and differing views on the pace of change after one year of his Presidency, Obama’s acknowledgement and understanding of the citizens concern about the pace of change was indeed eye-catching. He used the Union as a platform to remind Americans that he did not promise change to happen overnight, but instead made emphasis that it was going to be a real challenge. In his own words, the President said:

I campaigned on the promise of change — change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren’t sure if they still believe we can change — or that I can deliver it. But remember this — I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I could do it alone. Democracy in a nation of 300 million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy.” That is exactly just how it was.

Inheriting an economy that was almost on the edge, and a national security parable that plunged the country into two wars, it is worth not only acknowledging the difficulties encompassing transformation from such impending predicaments, but patience, objectivity and a rational analysis of adopted policies and priorities under any administration facing such a political dilemma, are what is required at such crucial times. Even history has shown that throughout our evolution as societies and communities, change was never found on a silver plate, especially in the aftermath of daring real challenges.

In his January 29th Washington Post article titled The State of the Union Address Reveals a President with two minds, George F. Will, got it all wrong, when he characterized the President as having Tiptoed using The John Quincy Adams Lobe from Sigmund – an unrealistic characterization that far decries the US socio-political and socio-economic landscape. The Union instead allowed Obama to be clearer with policies, thus raising his declined approval rating to what is expected of a nation’s commander in chief. Depicting Obama as an “avenging angel of populism,” is therefore unfounded and contradictory to realities across both the national and global political spectrum.

Chronicling the state of the economy and his administrations bail out efforts of financial institutions, President Obama could not have said it better, when he reminded the country about the state of the country before his ascension to power. He said it just like it is. He confidently argued, in his words that he inherited

“an economy rocked by a severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted — immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.”

Even though the editors agreed that the President’s reform agenda are critical to the nation’s economy and the creation of jobs over the long term, The Salt Lake Tribunes Januray27th editorial on The State of the Union nonetheless fell short by characterizing Obama’s speech as “a combination of aspirational rhetoric and a reframing of the old agenda — health care, energy and global warming, regulatory reform of finance — to fit the theme of restoring the economy”. A careful analysis of the President’s State of Union addresses would show the regulatory reform of the economy, Healthcare, Foreign Policy, education, climate change and the environment as the anchor of the  address; pressing policy issues that are aggressively confronted by the incumbent democratic administration.

Taking on Job creation, Obama’s outlined plan of putting Americans back to work through infrastructural development projects – bridges, fast railroads-, green energy jobs, and a plan to stimulate small businesses could not have come at a better time, when millions of citizens are struggling to search for employment. On that token, it is worth acknowledging observations by policy analysts that Job creation should have been a major priority alongside the implemented bailout policies during his administration’s first year in office. In hindsight, it was courageous for the President to acknowledge before the union mistakes made during the first year in office- moral courage that is an important leadership trait. It was also courageous for the President to initiative a Middle Class Task Force

Citing his administration’s efforts on national security and diplomacy, the President clearly outlined a blue print that will advance ‘the common security and prosperity of all people,’ a responsible exit from Iraq, a strategic approach to the looming Afghani war, a progressive confrontation of nuclear Proliferation, and American Value’s that continues to strengthen America’s standing around the world. That is another reason why the January 2010 State of Union address could rightly be characterized as; Presented Just Like it is.

On Bipartisanship, it was a good idea for President Obama to elaborate on the importance of Republicans and Democrats working together in addressing national agendas. That will only strengthen unity and solidarity across the national political landscape. However at a time when strategic institutions are threatened with collapse or failure, President Obama must transcend bipartisanship in the name of national interest. The New York Times editors could not have said it  better in their January 28th, 2010 editorial, The Second Year, when they argued that:

We would have liked to have heard a more forceful demand — rather than a polite invitation — for the Republicans to either support his health care reform plan or produce their own plan, one that provides real security for all Americans and has a real chance to reduce costs.”

At a time when the nations socio-economic and socio political structures are either threatened or undermined as a result of past failed policies, President Obama and the Democratic Party must fully understand their culpability for all future policy failures.

History has that our world from time immemorial, evolved around daunting challenges, propelling choices made as the driving mechanisms behind our sustenance and existence as a people, and a community. Sometimes we approach challenges by facing the hard realities-speaking openly and frankly- but at times we choose to shun those hard realities for reasons best known to us. That is just human nature. In the case of the daring real challenges we face today – threatened financial institutions , job losses, healthcare reform, national security and diplomacy, and education, President Obama’s address about the state of the Union could best be characterized as Presented Just it is. He spoke with honesty and truthfully presented the Union with the actual realities and challenges across the economic, social and political spectrum.

It was indeed a historical anecdote that would strengthen our collective quest of strengthening all the institutions threatened as a result of previous choices made. What else could one say?

Press Release: New Fictional Book “Dangerous Love” By Momodou Sawaneh

2010 February 2
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

New Book by Momodou S. Sawaneh Reveals Romance Intertwined with Mayhem and Murder in a Deeply Rooted Traditional African Culture Hostile to the Western Concept of Romance

This book is a fictional story about a young innocent African girl, Mary Gomez, who was born and raised in a big city. She found herself in a village when her parents Ida Ndow and Ebou Gomez divorced. Her rejection of strict village cultural traditions forces her to go against her selfish Uncle Sedu Ndow and Ida’s planned arranged marriage to a wealthy Minister…Edward Mendy.  sawaneh

What makes Mary follow her heart to be with a young school teacher named Sam Sey? And why would she go against her parents’ will alienating herself from her family and refusing a man with whom she could have amassed a fortune?

Dangerous Love —an emotional and captivating roller coaster of a story has all the answers.

Bronx, New York, January 6th, 2010. Momodou Sawaneh a Computer Engineer tells in his new book why the institution of arranged marriages rarely works even in some traditional and conservative societies, such as Africa and India today. The book targets people of all ages and backgrounds especially young people of fifteen years old or more and shows how children have started to go against arranged marriages and marry whom they personally and truly love. The book was released by Flamingos Publisher and is available through www.dangerous-love.com.

The book gives insight of the meaning of true love to those who are subjected to arranged marriages. It shows what it takes to pursue love if you truly belief in it. In other words, Romantic relationship is inborn even for people who live in areas where western civilization is lacking. There are people in these areas soul searching their hearts to be with someone they truly love even if it means harm.

“You learn very well about arranged marriages and African lore in this story… I…recommend this novel to those that love a romantic story with murder and mayhem intertwined within it.”

—Anastasia Cassella-Young, Mind Fog Reviews

For more information about Book Title or Author Name, please contact Flamingos Publisher at Tel: 917-974-1095 | Fax: 718-799-5896 | www.dangerous-love.com | Email: info@dangerous-love.com

Momodou S. Sawaneh is married with three children, lives in the Bronx in New York. As a Computer Engineer with Bachelor and Masters Degrees in Computer Science at Pace University in New York, Mr. Sawaneh has found his talent in storytelling. Deeply rooted in African traditional tales, he has his voice among a new generation of authors. Prior to writing Dangerous Love he published poems, newsletters and speeches.

Flamingos Publisher

1065 Gerard Avenue, suite 403

Bronx, New York 10452

Tel: 917-974-1095 | Fax: 718-799-5896

www.dangerous-love.com

Email: info@dangerous-love.com

Text of President Barack Obama’s first State of the Union Address as Provided by the White House

2010 January 29
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

OBAMA: Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:

Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the president shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. For 220 years, our leaders have fulfilled this duty. They’ve done so during periods of prosperity and tranquility. And they’ve done so in the midst of war and depression, at moments of great strife and great struggle.

It’s tempting to look back on these moments and assume that our progress was inevitable — that America was always destined to succeed. But when the Union was turned back at Bull Run, and the Allies first landed at Omaha Beach, victory was very much in doubt. When the market crashed on Black Tuesday, and civil rights marchers were beaten on Bloody Sunday, the future was anything but certain. These were the times that tested the courage of our convictions and the strength of our union. And despite all our divisions and disagreements, our hesitations and our fears, America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, as one people.

Again, we are tested. And again, we must answer history’s call.

One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by a severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted — immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.

But the devastation remains. One in 10 Americans still cannot find work. Many businesses have shuttered. Home values have declined. Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard. And for those who’d already known poverty, life has become that much harder.

This recession has also compounded the burdens that America’s families have been dealing with for decades — the burden of working harder and longer for less, of being unable to save enough to retire or help kids with college.

So I know the anxieties that are out there right now. They’re not new. These struggles are the reason I ran for president. These struggles are what I’ve witnessed for years in places like Elkhart, Ind., Galesburg, Ill. I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. The toughest to read are those written by children — asking why they have to move from their home, asking when their mom or dad will be able to go back to work.

For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough. Some are frustrated; some are angry. They don’t understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded, but hard work on Main Street isn’t; or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems. They’re tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness. They know we can’t afford it. Not now.

So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope — what they deserve — is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences, to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories, different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared: a job that pays the bills, a chance to get ahead, most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.

You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids, starting businesses and going back to school. They’re coaching Little League and helping their neighbors. One woman wrote to me and said, “We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged.”

It’s because of this spirit — this great decency and great strength — that I have never been more hopeful about America’s future than I am tonight. Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it’s time the American people get a government that matches their decency, that embodies their strength.

And tonight, tonight I’d like to talk about how together we can deliver on that promise.

It begins with our economy.

Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis. It was not easy to do. And if there’s one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, and everybody in between, it’s that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it. I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal.

But when I ran for president, I promised I wouldn’t just do what was popular — I would do what was necessary. And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today. More businesses would certainly have closed. More homes would have surely been lost.

So I supported the last administration’s efforts to create the financial rescue program. And when we took that program over, we made it more transparent and more accountable. And as a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we’ve recovered most of the money we spent on the banks. Most but not all.

To recover the rest, I’ve proposed a fee on the biggest banks. Now, I know Wall Street isn’t keen on this idea. But if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need.

Now, as we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible and help Americans who had become unemployed.

That’s why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans, made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA and passed 25 different tax cuts.

Now, let me repeat: We cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95 percent of working families. We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college.

I thought I’d get some applause on that one.

As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas and food and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven’t raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime.

Because of the steps we took, there are about 2 million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. Two hundred thousand work in construction and clean energy, 300,000 are teachers and other education workers. Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, first responders. And we’re on track to add another one-and-a-half-million jobs to this total by the end of the year.

The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act. That’s right — the Recovery Act, also known as the stimulus bill. Economists on the left and the right say this bill has helped save jobs and avert disaster. But you don’t have to take their word for it. Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its work force because of the Recovery Act. Talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act, until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created. Talk to the single teacher raising two kids who was told by her principal in the last week of school that because of the Recovery Act, she wouldn’t be laid off after all.

There are stories like this all across America. And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again. Retirement funds have started to gain back some of their value. Businesses are beginning to invest again, and slowly some are starting to hire again.

But I realize that for every success story, there are other stories, of men and women who wake up with the anguish of not knowing where their next paycheck will come from, who send out resumes week after week and hear nothing in response. That is why jobs must be our No. 1 focus in 2010, and that’s why I’m calling for a new jobs bill tonight.

Now, the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America’s businesses. But government can create the conditions necessary for businesses to expand and hire more workers.

We should start where most new jobs do — in small businesses, companies that begin when — companies that begin when an entrepreneur — when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides it’s time she became her own boss. Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession, and they’re ready to grow. But when you talk to small business owners in places like Allentown, Pa., or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they’re mostly lending to bigger companies. Financing remains difficult for small business owners across the country, even those that are making a profit.

So tonight, I’m proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat. I’m also proposing a new small business tax credit — one that will go to over 1 million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages. While we’re at it, let’s also eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, and provide a tax incentive for all large businesses and all small businesses to invest in new plants and equipment.

Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. From the first railroads to the interstate highway system, our nation has always been built to compete. There’s no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.

Tomorrow, I’ll visit Tampa, Fla., where workers will soon break ground on a new high-speed railroad funded by the Recovery Act. There are projects like that all across this country that will create jobs and help move our nation’s goods, services and information.

We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities — and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy-efficient, which supports clean energy jobs. And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it is time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas, and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America.

Now, the House has passed a jobs bill that includes some of these steps. As the first order of business this year, I urge the Senate to do the same, and I know they will. They will. People are out of work. They’re hurting. They need our help. And I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay.

But the truth is, these steps won’t make up for the seven million jobs that we’ve lost over the last two years. The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America’s families have confronted for years.

We can’t afford another so-called economic “expansion” like the one from the last decade — what some call the “lost decade” — where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion, where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health care and tuition reached record highs, where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.

From the day I took office, I’ve been told that addressing our larger challenges is too ambitious, such an effort would be too contentious. I’ve been told that our political system is too gridlocked, and that we should just put things on hold for a while.

For those who make these claims, I have one simple question: How long should we wait? How long should America put its future on hold?

You see, Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse. Meanwhile, China is not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany is not waiting. India is not waiting. These nations — they’re not standing still. These nations aren’t playing for second place. They’re putting more emphasis on math and science. They’re rebuilding their infrastructure. They’re making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs. Well, I do not accept second place for the United States of America.

As hard as it may be, as uncomfortable and contentious as the debates may become, it’s time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.

Now, one place to start is serious financial reform. Look, I am not interested in punishing banks. I’m interested in protecting our economy. A strong, healthy financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs. It channels the savings of families into investments that raise incomes. But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy.

We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions. We can’t allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy.

Now, the House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes. And the lobbyists are trying to kill it. But we cannot let them win this fight. And if the bill that ends up on my desk does not meet the test of real reform, I will send it back until we get it right. We’ve got to get it right.

Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history — an investment that could lead to the world’s cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year’s investments in clean energy — in the North Carolina company that will create 1,200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries, or in the California business that will put a thousand people to work making solar panels.

But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.

I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. And this year I’m eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate.

I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy. I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But here’s the thing — even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy-efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future — because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation.

Third, we need to export more of our goods. Because the more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America. So tonight, we set a new goal: We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support 2 million jobs in America. To help meet this goal, we’re launching a national export initiative that will help farmers and small businesses increase their exports, and reform export controls consistent with national security.

We have to seek new markets aggressively, just as our competitors are. If America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores. But realizing those benefits also means enforcing those agreements so our trading partners play by the rules. And that’s why we’ll continue to shape a Doha trade agreement that opens global markets, and why we will strengthen our trade relations in Asia and with key partners like South Korea and Panama and Colombia.

Fourth, we need to invest in the skills and education of our people.

Now, this year, we’ve broken through the stalemate between left and right by launching a national competition to improve our schools. And the idea here is simple: Instead of rewarding failure, we only reward success. Instead of funding the status quo, we only invest in reform — reform that raises student achievement, inspires students to excel in math and science, and turns around failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans, from rural communities to the inner city. In the 21st century, the best anti-poverty program around is a world-class education. And in this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than on their potential.

When we renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we will work with Congress to expand these reforms to all 50 states. Still, in this economy, a high school diploma no longer guarantees a good job. That’s why I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges, which are a career pathway to the children of so many working families.

To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that go to banks for student loans. Instead, let’s take that money and give families a $10,000 tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants. And let’s tell another 1 million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only 10 percent of their income on student loans, and all of their debt will be forgiven after 20 years — and forgiven after 10 years if they choose a career in public service, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they chose to go to college.

And by the way, it’s time for colleges and universities to get serious about cutting their own costs — because they, too, have a responsibility to help solve this problem.

Now, the price of college tuition is just one of the burdens facing the middle class. That’s why last year I asked Vice President Biden to chair a task force on middle-class families. That’s why we’re nearly doubling the child-care tax credit, and making it easier to save for retirement by giving access to every worker a retirement account and expanding the tax credit for those who start a nest egg. That’s why we’re working to lift the value of a family’s single largest investment — their home. The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments.

This year, we will step up refinancing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages. And it is precisely to relieve the burden on middle-class families that we still need health insurance reform. Yes, we do.

Now, let’s clear a few things up. I didn’t choose to tackle this issue to get some legislative victory under my belt. And by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn’t take on health care because it was good politics. I took on health care because of the stories I’ve heard from Americans with pre-existing conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage, patients who’ve been denied coverage, families — even those with insurance — who are just one illness away from financial ruin.

After nearly a century of trying — Democratic administrations, Republican administrations — we are closer than ever to bringing more security to the lives of so many Americans. The approach we’ve taken would protect every American from the worst practices of the insurance industry. It would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market. It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care.

And by the way, I want to acknowledge our first lady, Michelle Obama, who this year is creating a national movement to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity and make kids healthier. Thank you. She gets embarrassed.

Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office — the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress — our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.

Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, the process left most Americans wondering, “What’s in it for me?”

But I also know this problem is not going away. By the time I’m finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether. I will not walk away from these Americans and neither should the people in this chamber.

So, as temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we’ve proposed. There’s a reason why many doctors, nurses and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo. But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors and stop insurance company abuses, let me know. Let me know. Let me know. I’m eager to see it.

Here’s what I ask Congress, though: Don’t walk away from reform. Not now. Not when we are so close. Let us find a way to come together and finish the job for the American people. Let’s get it done. Let’s get it done.

Now, even as health care reform would reduce our deficit, it’s not enough to dig us out of a massive fiscal hole in which we find ourselves. It’s a challenge that makes all others that much harder to solve, and one that’s been subject to a lot of political posturing. So let me start the discussion of government spending by setting the record straight.

At the beginning of the last decade, the year 2000, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion. By the time I took office, we had a one-year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget. All this was before I walked in the door.

Now — just stating the facts. Now, if we had taken office in ordinary times, I would have liked nothing more than to start bringing down the deficit. But we took office amid a crisis. And our efforts to prevent a second depression have added another $1 trillion to our national debt. That, too, is a fact.

I’m absolutely convinced that was the right thing to do. But families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions. The federal government should do the same. So tonight, I’m proposing specific steps to pay for the trillion dollars that it took to rescue the economy last year.

Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.

We will continue to go through the budget, line by line, page by page, to eliminate programs that we can’t afford and don’t work. We’ve already identified $20 billion in savings for next year. To help working families, we’ll extend our middle-class tax cuts. But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts for oil companies, for investment fund managers and for those making over $250,000 a year. We just can’t afford it.

Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch, we’ll still face the massive deficit we had when I took office. More importantly, the cost of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security will continue to skyrocket. That’s why I’ve called for a bipartisan fiscal commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can’t be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline.

Now, yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I’ll issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans. And when the vote comes tomorrow, the Senate should restore the pay-as-you-go law that was a big reason for why we had record surpluses in the 1990s.

Now, I know that some in my own party will argue that we can’t address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting. And I agree — which is why this freeze won’t take effect until next year — when the economy is stronger. That’s how budgeting works. But understand — understand if we don’t take meaningful steps to rein in our debt, it could damage our markets, increase the cost of borrowing and jeopardize our recovery — all of which would have an even worse effect on our job growth and family incomes.

From some on the right, I expect we’ll hear a different argument — that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts including those for the wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away. The problem is that’s what we did for eight years. That’s what helped us into this crisis. It’s what helped lead to these deficits. We can’t do it again.

Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it’s time to try something new. Let’s invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let’s meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let’s try common sense. A novel concept.

To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust — deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we have to take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue — to end the outsized influence of lobbyists, to do our work openly, to give our people the government they deserve.

That’s what I came to Washington to do. That’s why — for the first time in history — my administration posts on our White House visitors online. That’s why we’ve excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs, or seats on federal boards and commissions.

But we can’t stop there. It’s time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my administration or with Congress. It’s time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office.

With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections. I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people. And I’d urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems.

I’m also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. Democrats and Republicans. Democrats and Republicans. You’ve trimmed some of this spending, you’ve embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. Tonight, I’m calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single Web site before there’s a vote, so that the American people can see how their money is being spent.

Of course, none of these reforms will even happen if we don’t also reform how we work with one another. Now, I’m not naive. I never thought that the mere fact of my election would usher in peace and harmony — and some post-partisan era. I knew that both parties have fed divisions that are deeply entrenched. And on some issues, there are simply philosophical differences that will always cause us to part ways. These disagreements, about the role of government in our lives, about our national priorities and our national security, they’ve been taking place for over 200 years. They’re the very essence of our democracy.

But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We can’t wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about the other side — a belief that if you lose, I win. Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can. The confirmation of — I’m speaking to both parties now. The confirmation of well-qualified public servants shouldn’t be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual senators.

Washington may think that saying anything about the other side, no matter how false, no matter how malicious, is just part of the game. But it’s precisely such politics that has stopped either party from helping the American people. Worse yet, it’s sowing further division among our citizens, further distrust in our government.

So, no, I will not give up on trying to change the tone of our politics. I know it’s an election year. And after last week, it’s clear that campaign fever has come even earlier than usual. But we still need to govern.

To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve problems, not run for the hills. And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that 60 votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town — a supermajority — then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it’s not leadership. We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions. So let’s show the American people that we can do it together.

This week, I’ll be addressing a meeting of the House Republicans. I’d like to begin monthly meetings with both Democratic and Republican leadership. I know you can’t wait.

Throughout our history, no issue has united this country more than our security. Sadly, some of the unity we felt after 9/11 has dissipated. We can argue all we want about who’s to blame for this, but I’m not interested in relitigating the past. I know that all of us love this country. All of us are committed to its defense. So let’s put aside the schoolyard taunts about who’s tough. Let’s reject the false choice between protecting our people and upholding our values. Let’s leave behind the fear and division, and do what it takes to defend our nation and forge a more hopeful future — for America and for the world.

That’s the work we began last year. Since the day I took office, we’ve renewed our focus on the terrorists who threaten our nation. We’ve made substantial investments in our homeland security and disrupted plots that threatened to take American lives. We are filling unacceptable gaps revealed by the failed Christmas attack, with better airline security and swifter action on our intelligence. We’ve prohibited torture and strengthened partnerships from the Pacific to South Asia to the Arabian Peninsula. And in the last year, hundreds of al-Qaida’s fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed — far more than in 2008.

And in Afghanistan, we’re increasing our troops and training Afghan security forces so they can begin to take the lead in July of 2011, and our troops can begin to come home. We will reward good governance, work to reduce corruption and support the rights of all Afghans — men and women alike. We’re joined by allies and partners who have increased their own commitments, and who will come together tomorrow in London to reaffirm our common purpose. There will be difficult days ahead. But I am absolutely confident we will succeed.

As we take the fight to al-Qaida, we are responsibly leaving Iraq to its people. As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I am doing as president. We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August. We will support the Iraqi government — we will support the Iraqi government as they hold elections, and we will continue to partner with the Iraqi people to promote regional peace and prosperity. But make no mistake: This war is ending, and all of our troops are coming home.

Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform — in Iraq, in Afghanistan and around the world — they have to know that we — that they have our respect, our gratitude, our full support. And just as they must have the resources they need in war, we all have a responsibility to support them when they come home. That’s why we made the largest increase in investments for veterans in decades — last year. That’s why we’re building a 21st century VA. And that’s why Michelle has joined with Jill Biden to forge a national commitment to support military families.

Now, even as we prosecute two wars, we’re also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people — the threat of nuclear weapons. I’ve embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons and seeks a world without them. To reduce our stockpiles and launchers, while ensuring our deterrent, the United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades. And at April’s nuclear security summit, we will bring 44 nations together here in Washington, D.C., behind a clear goal: securing all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years, so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists.

Now, these diplomatic efforts have also strengthened our hand in dealing with those nations that insist on violating international agreements in pursuit of nuclear weapons. That’s why North Korea now faces increased isolation and stronger sanctions — sanctions that are being vigorously enforced. That’s why the international community is more united, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is more isolated. And as Iran’s leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise.

That’s the leadership that we are providing — engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We’re working through the G-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We’re working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science and education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We’re helping developing countries to feed themselves and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bioterrorism or an infectious disease — a plan that will counter threats at home and strengthen public health abroad.

As we have for over 60 years, America takes these actions because our destiny is connected to those beyond our shores. But we also do it because it is right. That’s why, as we meet here tonight, over 10,000 Americans are working with many nations to help the people of Haiti recover and rebuild. That’s why we stand with the girl who yearns to go to school in Afghanistan, why we support the human rights of the women marching through the streets of Iran, why we advocate for the young man denied a job by corruption in Guinea. For America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity. Always.

Abroad, America’s greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we’re all created equal, that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it, if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.

We must continually renew this promise. My administration has a civil rights division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination. We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate. This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are. It’s the right thing to do.

We’re going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws — so that women get equal pay for an equal day’s work. And we should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system — to secure our borders and enforce our laws and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nation.

In the end, it’s our ideals, our values that built America — values that allowed us to forge a nation made up of immigrants from every corner of the globe, values that drive our citizens still. Every day, Americans meet their responsibilities to their families and their employers. Time and again, they lend a hand to their neighbors and give back to their country. They take pride in their labor and are generous in spirit. These aren’t Republican values or Democratic values that they’re living by, business values or labor values. They’re American values.

Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions — our corporations, our media, and, yes, our government — still reflect these same values. Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper. But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people’s doubts grow. Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith. The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates to silly arguments, big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away.

No wonder there’s so much cynicism out there. No wonder there’s so much disappointment.

I campaigned on the promise of change — change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren’t sure if they still believe we can change — or that I can deliver it.

But remember this — I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I could do it alone. Democracy in a nation of 300 million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. That’s just how it is.

Those of us in public office can respond to this reality by playing it safe and avoid telling hard truths and pointing fingers. We can do what’s necessary to keep our poll numbers high and get through the next election instead of doing what’s best for the next generation.

But I also know this: If people had made that decision 50 years ago or 100 years ago or 200 years ago, we wouldn’t be here tonight. The only reason we are here is because generations of Americans were unafraid to do what was hard, to do what was needed even when success was uncertain, to do what it took to keep the dream of this nation alive for their children and their grandchildren.

Our administration has had some political setbacks this year and some of them were deserved. But I wake up every day knowing that they are nothing compared to the setbacks that families all across this country have faced this year. And what keeps me going — what keeps me fighting — is that despite all these setbacks, that spirit of determination and optimism, that fundamental decency that has always been at the core of the American people, that lives on.

It lives on in the struggling small business owner who wrote to me of his company, “None of us,” he said, “… are willing to consider, even slightly, that we might fail.”

It lives on in the woman who said that even though she and her neighbors have felt the pain of recession, “We are strong. We are resilient. We are American.”

It lives on in the 8-year-old boy in Louisiana, who just sent me his allowance and asked if I would give it to the people of Haiti.

And it lives on in all the Americans who’ve dropped everything to go someplace they’ve never been and pull people they’ve never known from the rubble, prompting chants of “USA! USA! USA!” when another life was saved.

The spirit that has sustained this nation for more than two centuries lives on in you, its people. We have finished a difficult year. We have come through a difficult decade. But a new year has come. A new decade stretches before us. We don’t quit. I don’t quit. Let’s seize this moment — to start anew, to carry the dream forward and to strengthen our union once more.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America.

A Tale of Haiti’s Evolutionary Historical Pattern –Slavery, Mal-governance, Institutional Failure, Poverty, Disease, Natural Disaster, and Dysfunctional Humanitarian Interventions

2010 January 26
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

From the caprices of slavery to the bosoms of mal-governance and institutional failures, poverty and disease, dictatorship, and most recently the siege by Mother Nature, Haiti’s historical evolutionary pattern has become a tale that has transcended variable epithets of misery deeply rooted in to the annals of modern times.

Triumphantly arising from the martyrdom that drove the forces of Napoleon Bonaparte from the Island, Haiti became the first freed black nation to achieve independence in 1804. The history of Haiti stems from the era of slavery when the brute efforts of the French propelled the forceful transportation of Africans to the Island nation in the inhumane quest of working on plantations for slave Masters; a historical antidote designed to transform Haiti as a ‘sweatshop’ of western interest, as rightly argued by Dr. Leonard Jeffries, Professor of African Studies and Political Science at City College of New York.

Determining what therefore propelled Haiti to the path of misery, the apocalyptic wanton tail of institutional catastrophe, and the terse intra-political battling that characterized the Island nations socio-economic and socio-political horizons is nothing complex, but hard fact evolutionary realities that continues to surface under a historical limelight.

When Haiti attained Independence in 1804, it not only created a “bicentennial of the world’s first black nation”, but a symbol of hope for black Liberation movements around the world. In his January 21 op-ed article published with the New York Times, Mark Tanner chronicled Haiti’s Independence as
” A frightful example of freedom carried too far. American slaveholders desperately feared that Haiti’s fires of revolt would overleap those few hundred miles of sea and inflame their own human chattel.”

Nonetheless, not only did Haiti struggled to be bestowed with an honorable international recognition, but the Island nation was left with institutions design for state failure, and the ploy of pitting citizens into violence, a military and a market economy that has reduced Haiti to divisions and rival ethnic competitions for survival and control of state machinery for financial gains.

Amidst a ‘fractured parliaments’ and ‘lame duck governments’ that characterized Haiti’s decade’s long sovereignty, the siege by mother nature that catapulted the January 12, 2010, befallen 7.0 magnitude earth quake brought to light the Island nations sad realities of modern times. The roaring and rumbling echo of Mother Nature rounded up buildings to dust; destroying Haiti’s recovering infrastructures and killing over 100, 000 people according to analysts and pundits.

The catastrophic earthquake, left many unanswered questions. Several analysts began pondering what the future hold for the Island nation following decade’s long violent political instability, poverty, disease, and wanton – squandering of resources by a privilege few at the expense of the poor majority. Nick Caister of the BBC put it this way:
” Haiti appears to have had more than its fair share of political upheaval, misrule, poverty, and natural disasters. In addition, as has happened so often in the nation’s past, just when the situation was getting better, a fresh catastrophe struck.”

This siege by nature has indeed brought to light the ambivalence of Haiti’s evolutionary political realities thus propelling our civilization into a call for action. Even though many others use religious doctrines in characterizing the Island nation’s siege by mother- nature, only God knows the state of religion and ethics across the battered nations. What is certain is that only Haitians can salvage themselves on the path to redemption.

Globally, a collective response by national governments and humanitarian organizations to embark on relief efforts has taken a forefront of our quest to confront the onslaught. The United Nations (UN), the United States (US), the European Union (EU), the Canadians, Australians, Venezuela and several Latin American nations have already embarked on humanitarian efforts pledging millions of Dollars in aid and recovery. President Obama for example pledged over $100 million in aid, and has since deployed the US Military and other rescue teams. The UN and the EU have all embarked on relief efforts pledging hundreds of millions of dollars to help rescue Haiti out of such an untimely natural calamity.

As recue efforts continues taking shape in Haiti, the debate on what the future holds for Haiti has also become the mouthpiece for policy analysts and professionals. Disaster has indeed struck Haiti amid challenges of a turbulent political climate and ravages of poverty thus forcing thousands to flee for greener pastures elsewhere.

Taking a backdrop to the questions, what does the future hold for the embattled Haitian Island nation, what have we learned from previous humanitarian and relief efforts in Haiti, it is important to understand the millions if not billions pledged for previous humanitarian efforts was not efficiently utilized. For example in his article titled Haiti: So Many Missteps published with the World Policy Journal, Michele Wucker argued that from 1995 – 2002 alone,
“Haiti received $730 million from all international donors combined; a sum that represented more than 10 percent of the country’s GDP, yet barely began to address Haiti’s staggering needs. Some of that money went to pay interest on government debt and to support the balance of payments; other funds went to train a new police force, support elections, and provide food and short-term jobs. However, little was directed towards long-term investments in healthcare, education, and infrastructure.”

The international community must therefore, firstly put in place policy measures that will ensure that the administration of humanitarian aid in confronting mother natures siege be effectively and efficiently used in helping Haitians help themselves in the midst of uncertainty, misery sorrow and the catastrophic crippling of the nation – health, poverty, infrastructure, education must be placed high on the agenda. A depoliticization of all policies towards Haiti must be the anchor of all future efforts towards Haiti.

Secondly, it is important to adopt policy that will lift restrictions, facilitate the integration of Haitian women, children, and critically injured across nations of our civilized world. The Obama administration and the administration of President Wade of Senegal West Africa have set the stage for other nations to follow suit.

Thirdly, helping Haiti sustain itself requires ensuring accountability- zero tolerance for corruption - providing training and giving Haitians an opportunity to generate alternate source of income through macro and micro-economic projects firmly embedded across all levels of the Island nations social structures.

Fourthly, for Haiti’s future political stability, it is important that Haiti’s sister nation, the Dominican Republic be involve in all policy towards current humanitarian and reconstruction efforts. This is so because the Dominican Republic is the first country to open doors for Haitians when both natural and political disaster strikes the Island nation. Historically, the Dominican Republic has used it s geographic proximity to undermine Haitian Governments (Wucker 2004)

Finally, all future policies towards Haiti should stem from accurate assessment of Haiti’s leaders with an emphasis on their governing and human rights and not on a representation of political dogma along the global political spectrum.

The tale of Haiti’s evolutionary historical pattern could therefore best be characterized as one of slavery, mal-governance, institutional failure, poverty, disease, natural disaster, and dysfunctional humanitarian interventions. What else could one say?

The author is an Independent Researcher, Analyst, and Consultant. He also produces The Sword of Truth at http://www.sofawarrior.blog.com/ He could be reached at bsm235@nyu.edu.

Haiti Earthquake Appeal

2010 January 16
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

Culled from www.islamic-relief.com

A massive earthquake has struck the Caribbean island of Haiti. Thousands are feared dead with many more seriously injured.

Islamic Relief has launched an appeal for £1 million to respond to the disaster.

The epicentre of the 7.0 magnitude earthquake was just 16 kilometres from the capital Port-au-Prince. Much of the city is made up of slums and poorly constructed houses that would not be able to withstand an earthquake.

The scale of the disaster is not yet known as all communication lines are currently down. But there are reports that homes, government buildings and hotels have collapsed, with people still being dug out of the rubble.

The earthquake struck at 5pm local time on Tuesday 12th January 2010 and many people have spent the night on the streets. Several strong aftershocks caused further chaos and panic.

Hospitals are struggling to cope with the large numbers of injured people and there is an urgent need for emergency medical care, food, clean water and shelter.

Haiti is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere, and struggles from endemic poverty, food shortages and violence. It has suffered from many recent natural disasters including serious hurricanes and storms in 2008.

Please visit the Islamic Relief website  at http://www.islamic-relief.com/donations/  to donate and  help respond to the disaster.

Haiti

2010 January 14
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

Editorial  Culled From The New York Times

Published: January 14, 2010
Once again, the world weeps with Haiti. The earthquake that struck on Tuesday did damage on a scale that scarcely could have been imagined had we all not seen the photos and videos and read the survivors’ agonizing accounts — of the sudden crumbling of mountainside slums, schools, hospitals, even the Parliament building and presidential palace.

Whenever disaster strikes, we are reminded that Haiti is the poorest country in the hemisphere. And each time there is a disaster, this country and others help — for a while. This time must be different.

Haiti urgently needs relief to dig out and shelter survivors, and to nurse, feed and clothe people who had little to start with and now have nothing left. But Haiti needs more. It needs a commitment to finally move beyond the relentless poverty, despair and dysfunction that would be a disaster anywhere else but in Haiti are the norm.

President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton have promised that assistance from the United States will be swift through the coordinated efforts of the military, civilian aid agencies and nongovernmental organizations. The administration must make sure that the upswelling of generosity turns into sustained action, replacing the confusion and chaos on the ground with a rational and effective campaign — first to rescue, then to rebuild.

Private citizens can help speed the process by giving generously to charitable organizations that have a track record in Haiti. Those groups know where to direct humanitarian aid and how to spend it prudently.

The United Nations mission in Haiti suffered a tragic blow on Tuesday when its headquarters in Port-au-Prince, the nation’s capital, were destroyed. Its chief and dozens of employees remain unaccounted for. The organization must find a way to recover quickly to resume its vital mission.

Former President Bill Clinton, the United Nations’ special envoy to Haiti, has an opportunity to bring all his skills of leadership and persuasion to bear. If ever there was a time for so gifted and trouble-prone former president to make himself useful, this is it.

The United States has a special responsibility to help its neighbor. This is an opportunity for President Obama to demonstrate how the United States shoulders its responsibilities and mobilizes other countries to do their full part as well. Even as he urges his administration and others to act, he should remind them — and himself — that this is not the work of a few months. It is a commitment of years.

On Wednesday, the Obama administration said it was halting the pending deportation of up to 30,000 Haitians who have run afoul of the immigration agency. The government should now take the next step by granting these immigrants temporary protected status — as it has to survivors of Latin American earthquakes and other disasters — so that the Haitian diaspora in the United States will be allowed to work and send vitally needed money home.

An earthquake this size would have been a catastrophe in any country. But this was only partly a natural disaster. Look at Haiti and you will see what generations of misrule, poverty and political strife will do to a country. Haiti, suffering forever, is in the direst straits. But Haitians do not need condolences. They need help and the ability to help themselves.

The Senegal-Gambian Joint Communiqué: A Constructive Diplomatic Move Long Overdue.

2010 January 14
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

Following the one-day official visit to the Gambia by President of the Sister Republic of Senegal, several analysts and pundits received such a move with a mix feeling. Many others blatantly theorized the visit as one that has undermined consolidating the rule of law in the tiny miniscule state of the republic of The Gambia. Several others held a differing view that the one-day working visit during which the two regional leaders adopted a developmental continuum communiqué is a diplomatic move that will bolster and strengthen peace and security in the sub-region.

The good questions now are: How will the one day working visit shape the parables of peace and security as a developmental agenda of the African Union, How will the visit strengthen the relationship between the two sister states of Senegal and The Gambia? These are the very good questions that all positive and constructive actors across the political landscape of the two sister states continues to grapple with.

Responding to the aforementioned questions requires an in-depth understanding of the history of the two sister-states, the relationship and family ties between the two countries, the economic correlations and Africa’s developmental agenda of peace and security from a broader perspective.

Historically, it is worth understanding that the people of Senegal and the Gambia are one people in two separate nations due to the ravages of colonialism. It is further worth acknowledging that the people share the same culture, religion, language as enshrined across the premises of traditional values across family ties. This traditional tie extends as far as Guinea-Bissau, Guinea-Conakry, Mali and beyond.

Politically the memorandum of understanding adopted by the two leaders falls along the parables of Africa’s integration across economic, political and social lines, thus emboldening the continent’s developmental agenda. Although many others are skeptical about the effectiveness of the nouvelle cooperation, it is nonetheless worth crediting the two leaders for embarking on a progressive and objective path that the region rightly needed. In a nutshell, the communiqué lays a foundation to ponder cross-border security, the low-level insurgence in Casammance and the fragile political situation of Guinea-Bissau.

Economically, one must not underestimate the importance of building a bridge across the river Gambia. This will facilitate the smooth transportation of goods and agricultural commodities and other essentials of life across territorial boundaries of the two sister states. The bridge across the river Gambia will benefit not only people of the two nations, but will further have a positive impact on the business activities of traders from other ECOWAS member states such as Guinea-Conakry, Guinea- Bissau, Mauretania, and Mali, just to name a few.

Socially, the adopted memorandum of understanding will strengthen the cordial relationship that has existed between the people of the two nations for centuries. No one can deny that the impact of the Westphalia State System has only caused divisions between the same people to co-exist in two separate nations- a colonial legacy that continues to undermine Africa’ s developmental agenda. The two leaders must therefore be commended for their vision and courage in championing peace, security and economic integration as Africa’s developmental agenda. Hopefully, the administration of both the two sister states, will make an aggressive follow-up, for an effective implementation of the adopted communiqué.

Taking an in-depth analysis of appalling human rights as a concern raised by most political analysts, it is worth understanding that the communiqué provides an opportunity for the two leaders to courageously confront the issue of peace, security and development as critical to meeting challenges of modern times. Human rights and security must be two very important policy themes that the administrations of both countries must not overlook.

Brought to the diplomatic table or not, these two policy themes are critical to the attainment of all mutual developmental agendas for both nations. During such crucial times of our transformation as a continent, it is important to remind the administration of both sister nations that only history will judge them for any failures in adopting policy measures geared towards strengthening peace and security as critical to development for the beloved Senegambia people.

Taking a backdrop to the questions how the adopted communiqué will shape peace and security in the sub-region, and how it will strengthen the relationship between the two sister states, one could confidently argue that at a time when Africa is aggressively pursuing economic, political and social integration, and a time when the sub-region is threatened by a turbulent political landscapes in Guinea-Conakry and Ivory Coast, the adopted communiqué could not have come at a better time. We must therefore only commend and encourage the two leaders to put the communiqué into action. What else could one say?

Up to three million impacted by Haitian quake

2010 January 13
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

Courtesy of National Post.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2436152

haiti

GENEVA — The Red Cross and United Nations on Wednesday unlocked emergency funds and mobilised supplies for a “massive” aid operation in Haiti amid fears of huge devastation following the earthquake there.

The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies said it was gearing up to help a “maximum of three million people,” based on the number of people who live in the affected area.

Federation spokesman Jean-Luc Martinage said “a massive international aid operation was needed” as aid agencies reported that access was hampered by rubble, while electricity, water and phone services were down.

Elisabeth Byrs, a spokeswoman for the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said the priority was to find survivors.

“We are working against the clock,” she told journalists, as some 37 search and rescue teams from a global network were mobilised by the United Nations.

UN maps placed the epicentre barely 15 kilometres (10 miles) from the capital Port-au-Prince and indicated that some 238,000 people lived in areas exposed to the most intense tremor with “violent” or “extreme” shaking.

The Red Cross said the area most affected by the 7.0 magnitude quake was Port-au-Prince, and its population of some four million, and the West Province with a population of 2.2 million.

Aid officials reported that the worst damage was to poorly built homes and shantytowns but insisted it was too early to give more precise estimates of a “large number” of casualties.

“Amid the crying and wailing, people are spending the night outside,” the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) chief in Haiti, Ricardo Conti, said in a statement.

“People are trying to comfort each other. What you are hearing in the streets are the prayers of thanks of those who survived,” he added.

“It is extremely difficult to move around the city to assess needs. What is certain is that the quake has had a massive impact on a population already reeling from other recent disasters”.

The Red Cross said “the most urgent needs at this time are search and rescue, field hospitals, emergency health, water purification, emergency shelter, logistics and telecommunications.”

It said it was drawing on emergency stocks in Haiti, which is often hit by sever floods and hurricanes, allowing help for 3,000 families for three to four days.

“But we’ll have to swiftly bring relief supplies from our regional disaster response centre based in Panama,” Mr. Martinage added.

UN aid was also being prepared at a regional base in Panama, ready to be flown in through the airport at Port-au-Prince or the neighbouring Dominican Republic.

The UN’s World Food Program said it could respond swiftly with some 15,000 tonnes of food supplies in Haiti.

“We have already launched an emergency operation,” said WFP official Charles Vincent.

Six ICRC relief experts and a UN team were due to fly into Haiti on Wednesday to support local aid workers and help coordinate international relief.

A Red Cross team would also be leading a crucial assessment of the damage in Haiti along with European Union experts that will allow relief agencies to gauge aid needs.

The ICRC said medical needs and clean water supplies would be “considerable in the short term.”

“Everything that’s infrastructure isn’t working,” said ICRC spokesman Simon Schorno.

OCHA indicated that areas immediately to the west of the capital suffered the full force of the quake late Tuesday.

Why the US needs to be concerned about East Africa

2010 January 6
Posted by SOFA JAWARO

While the eyes of most pundits and spies are on the current Military Action in Yemen. The Situation on the other side of the Gulf of Aden needs just as must focus as there is currently towards Yemen.

The Situation in Somalia does not show any sign of improving anytime in the near future. In recent days Al-Shaabab the Islamist Militia with alleged links to Al-Qaida has driven the World Food Program out of Southern Sudan. There are now reports that a Somali clan which has 300,000 Refugees currently sheltered in Kenya has stated that it will protect the Kenyan Border. In 2009 the Islamists threatened to attack Kenya for its support of the Western Initiative to restore a functioning government in Mogadishu. And the Situation regarding Somaliland cannot be ignored anymore either. It’s time for the long delayed elections which have been delayed so often to finally take place in Somaliland. Where are the NDI and the IRI?

Speaking of Kenya the reports that the ICC will be looking into the violent aftermath of the December 2007 Elections are evidence of a major problem. Despite the Current Government and it efforts to show harmony Graft is a problem and the reports of the influx of weapons into the Western Part of the Country do not bode well for the next electoral cycle.

Although it has not been mentioned by the US Media (Which is not a surprise to this reporter) Ethiopia and Eritrea had a border clash on New Year’s Day. Although this was a small scale firefight this action taken into context with a reported operation by the Eritrean Opposition and the UN Security Council imposing Sanctions against Eritrea for its reported actions in Somalia pose serious challenges for the Eritrean Government. It is now being seen as part of the Problem with tensions in the region and not part of the solution. This aspect will have to change for any Efforts for Peace in the Region to move forward.

Writing on Confused Eagle I raised Concerns regarding recent reports of actions that have been taken by the Ugandan Government particularly with Military Operations against the LRA and other actions taken in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. For far too long the US has provided a Blank Check to Uganda and to Ethiopia as a matter of fact. Both of these countries need some oversight within Washington.

This is a lot of information to digest. There are various US interests at stake here. It is time for the Administration to take the blinders off. There are other areas of concern here besides the Islamists in Somalia and Yemen.

The Author Comments on US Policy towards Africa and Publishes Confused Eagle on the Internet. It can be found at confusedeagle.livejournal.com